PART II Virtue Critiques: Evidence and Inquiry
نویسندگان
چکیده
Evidentialism appears to be a normative theory. It says what one ought to believe. In Evidentialism Conee and Feldman say ‘We hold the general view that one epistemically ought to have the doxastic attitudes that fit one’s evidence. We think that being epistemically obligatory is equivalent to being epistemically justified. There are in the literature two other sorts of view about epistemic obligations’ (2004: 88). Feldman has written a number of things concerning this—including ‘The Ethics of Belief’, reprinted in Evidentialism:
منابع مشابه
Virtue in Machiavelli’s Political Thought
The interpretability of Machiavelli’s political thought relates, in the most part, to the concept of virtue and its dimensions. In Western thought, this concept has had continuity and has reached the Renaissance and Machiavelli’s times. In the Roman and Medieval tradition, philosophical, verbal, religious and even literary and historical approaches were dominant in the clarification and explana...
متن کاملEvidence based medicine in nuclear medicine practice; Part II: Appraising and applying the evidence
As described in the first part of this article, Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is a growing part of medical practice which emphasizes on the best evidence. Finding this evidence by formulating an answerable question and searching strategies were described in the first part of this review. In this part, appraising the retrieved article (with the main focus on the diag...
متن کاملThe deconstructing angel: nursing, reflection and evidence-based practice.
This paper explores Jacques Derrida's strategy of deconstruction as a way of understanding and critiquing nursing theory and practice. Deconstruction has its origins in philosophy, but I argue that it is useful and relevant as a way of challenging the dominant paradigm of any discipline, including nursing. Because deconstruction is notoriously difficult to define, I offer a number of examples o...
متن کاملEpistemic Virtue from the Viewpoints of Mulla Sadra and Zagzebski
This paper compares epistemic virtue from the viewpoints of Zagzebski and Mulla Sadra, aiming to determine the extent to which their viewpoints on epistemic virtue are similar. Zagzebski, the contemporary philosopher, considers epistemic virtue as the basis on which knowledge is interpreted. She sees epistemic virtue as a requirement for achieving knowledge. Mulla Sadra, the founder of Transcen...
متن کاملIbn Sīnā’s Practical Philosophy
This article is a brief review of Ibn Sīnā’s practical philosophy. It begins with a discussion of the Platonic, Aristotelian, and Neo-Platonic influences on Ibn Sīnā’s practical philosophy, as well as the influence of Fārābī and of Islamic religious teachings. The creative synthesis invented by Ibn Sīnā requires a particular view of the relation between religion and philosophy in such a manner ...
متن کامل